A frequent objection to renting exhibit booths is that they are too expensive - purchasing is supposedly less expensive in the long run, depending on how many shows an exhibitor goes to. And surely that’s sometimes true - we have studied the subject at length. Primarily, however, the opinion is based on comparing apples and oranges. An “erector set” style of exhibit booth, when purchased, will cost less than our custom designed rental exhibits. The difference is not in purchase versus rental, the difference is in VALUE. In the realm of trade show marketing, value is derived from marketing impact - how effectively you are at reaching your trade show objectives. If the erector set booth is inferior in accomplishing those objectives, then you’ll get more value from the custom designed and specially fabricated booth. In order to say rental is more expensive than purchase, or visa versa, you’ll need to compare apples to apples. That’s quite difficult to do in this business, but supposing we can, let’s start by introducing the items purchasers tend to underestimate:
-Storage
-Crates
-Inspection/Handling
-Damages / Repairs
-Redesign/Reconfigure
-Refurbishing
We’ve done a study of the subject in our corporate white papers, here, and in most cases, it becomes a break even [the document holds a vast number of assumptions, intentionally biased IN FAVOR OF purchase, just to prove the point of rental's economy]. Some scenarios reflect a slight advantage for rental, some reflect an advantage of combining rental and purchase, and some scenarios reflect an advantage for purchase.
Typically, purchase programs that look cost effective on paper have a major hazard: overlapping shows. If you go to 10 or 15 shows each year, the ship/setup/show/dismantle/ship/inspect/repair/ship schedules overlap at some point. This neccessitates having at least two booths, and negating the cost advantage.
Let’s suppose, however, that purchase is always more cost effective. Surely if you only do one show each year, you would have to use the same booth, with the same graphics, for years on end, in order to save over rental. Why your company would bother exhibiting at all in that scenario escapes me (but we see it all the time), but yes you’ll be saving money. Instead of argueing that rental gives you greater flexibility, I’d like to offer an often neglected reason:
Because the exhibit booth is only a small aspect of your exhibit program - but it’s the one that sets you apart from your competition!
The exhibit booth itself construes roughly one third of the budget that a company might set for a given trade show. The show services are more and more often responsible for another third, and the cost of your booth space may, depending on the venue, equate to the remaining third. If you include the travel and lodging expenses of your sales and marketing people that are attending the show, and any technicians to install software or program a machine being showcased, the proportion of your trade show budget that the exhibit actually occupies shrinks even further.
Supposing that your exhibit booth is 1/4th of your total costs, why are you jeopardizing or sacrificing the marketing impact of your entire trade show endeavor over a slight projected advantage!?!?! Seems like a bad idea to this trade show guy. Give every show your best effort - RENT!